« Inequality and Democracy | Main | Any Regrets »

Wire 4.1

10 Sep 2006 11:15 pm

The season premiere's been available On Demand for days, but I waited to watch it at its actual airtime so that I could gather my crew and also see the episode in its high definition form (why doesn't Comcast make HBO shows available on HD On Demand?) and I . . . don't have that much to say about it. I will say that I was concerned the show might head downhill and, so far, there's no particular evidence of that. Instead, a comment about the earlier seasons.

watchmen10.jpgOne complaint (or perhaps just observation) I've heard from several quarters about the show is that the characters of Omar and (especially) Brother Mouzone break with the show's realism. I've been trying to think of the right thing to say about that, and what I've come up with is that it's a bit akin to complaining that Dr. Manhattan impugns the realism of Watchmen. It's true, of course, that he isn't a very realistic character. What that goes to show, however, is that one's initial impulse to call Watchmen "realistic" is simply a mistake.

The Wire is, in some ways, a very similar enterprise. It's a complicated, very layered, story with lots of internal resonances. It's also very invested in deploying a subversive take on some American cultural archetypes -- cops and police procedurals on the one hand, superheros and comic books in the other. A certain style that one might term "realismesque" (for want of a better term), but realism, as such, isn't really what's on offer. For that, you need to go watch The Corner (legitimately recommended, though it's hellishly depressing).

Once you think of Omar and Mouzone in this context, you see that bits of irrealism are popping up everyone. The show is really very highly allegorical and filled with symbolism of a sort as seen in Season Two's parable of deindustrialization or the small thing of the names the dealers give to their product.

That said, I had lunch with Mark Kleiman last week and asked if he watched the show. He said that no, he doesn't watch any television at all. Then we talked a bit about crime control and drug policy, in the course of which he mentioned -- unprompted and without any description of the Omar character -- that stickup crews are both a real phenomenon of the Baltimore street and actually a somewhat eccentric one not seen in most American urban areas.

Share This

Comments (23)

"For that, you need to go watch The Corner (legitimately recommended, though it's hellishly depressing)."

It's worth noting that The Corner is up on HBO On Demand for one more week.

I've shied away from it so far, although I'm close to 100% sure that I'll really enjoy it once I actually start watching it.

The word your looking for is "verisimilitude." Its a zany coincidence that I had to look that word up a couple of days ago on dictionary.com. (Of course, I also had to look up "eponymous.")

Omar is one of the greatest characters on television - "Oh, Indeed"

FWIW, Simon and Burns don't claim realism (Burns quote was something like "we don't show the real, because the real is too dark.")

Also, they are pretty upfront that Mouzone and especially Omar are really Leone characters transported into modern Baltimore for dramatic effect. And really, I don't think either character's...eccentricities really take away from the tenor of the show - so Omar is a little more flamboyant that a real stickup boy might be, but back out the quotability (my fave: "that is, if I was constibulatin' like y'all") and is his feud with Bell/Barksdale really unbelievable?

I don't think this defense quite works, because the complaint isn't that Omar and Mouzone aren't realistic, period--but that they're not realistic even on the show's own terms. I've read David Simon saying that Omar is based on an amalgam of real stick-up guys, so I buy that, as far as it goes, but the showdown scene in the alley between Omar and Mouzone, where they coolly point their guns at each other while discussing the merits of each weapon is stylized in a way that nothing else in the show is. There are lots of little moments like that, mostly with Omar, some with Mouzone, that feel like they're taking you out of The Wire's Baltimore and putting you in a tv show.

Ogged,

I don't disagree. Nor do I begrudge the show the little bit of fun it has with Omarian flourishes...

Though writing this, I have a partially formed theory: The defining conceit of The Wire throughout its run is the dehumanising aspects of "institutions" on individuals. Omar, and to a lesser extent, Mouzone are largely outside of any of the institutions the show examines, so their behavior doesn't have to quite fit. Thus they can almost act as some kind of deus ex machina to push the story in whichever way it needs to go - Stringer had to go by the end of season 3 (or so says David Simon), and Marlo, hard as he is, wasn't going to get him.

So it's either McNulty locking him up, which would be too NYPD Blue, or something else. Enter Omar, on a pale horse he rides...

"There are lots of little moments like that, mostly with Omar, some with Mouzone, that feel like they're taking you out of The Wire's Baltimore and putting you in a tv show."

I've never had that kind of problem with Omar and Mouzone.

What takes me out of the Wire's world is Cutty. Every time he's on screen, I feel like I'm suddenly watching a mawkish After school special.

Dunno if Pooh's theory would hold up or not, but I like it on first glance.

Some people at Unfogged were also emphasising Omar's position outside institutions as an explanation for his portrayal.

I think it's the most engrossing show on TV, at least now that Six Feet Under is six feet under. No other show touches it for social commentary. If anyone's interested, I wrote about it the other night at:
http://nettertainment.blogspot.com/2006/09/wire.html

I don't have any problem with Omar, as an extra complexity factor. He is a good actor. Mouzone is a little forced. That they are both gay seems to be unnecessary. Akima's subplot is a little more believable, but even this is forced. It's just not really relevant to the rest of the character and it's kind of flaunted out there for the shock value.

Stick up crews are rare, but gay black stick up crews? Or how about openly recruitable extremely closeted fundamentalist bow-tie wearing hitmen? You can take out the same sex interests and still have really interesting characters. Especially given the enormous prejudice in the black community against gay men. Omar is a vigilante and he's openly gay? No way in Baltimore. The Jamaicans alone would hunt his ass down just to make a point. Don't get me wrong; I like Omar. I just think that it is too much to think his overt choices in romance which never bring back to him any negative consequences make his contribution to the show less valuable then it could be.

Not having seens 4.1, but finding it very easy to accept Mouzone, and thinking Omar is important for the overall show, I was not under the impression the impression, as patience is, that Brother Mouzone is gay.

"I was not under the impression the impression, as patience is, that Brother Mouzone is gay."

Next thing, you'll be trying to convince people that Tucker Carlson isn't gay either...

If anyone hasn't read it yet, read this long-ass and highly involved interview with David Simon. The creators have lofty ambitions for this series, so far as to claim that they want to create the visual medium equivalent of a traditional novel:

http://members.aol.com/TheWireHBO/exclusive-1.html

As far as Omar goes, does anyone else see a parallel to "Puck"?
At least in some elements anyway.. misbehavior along side dignified propriety.. in the context of the Baltimore drug scene.

There is absolutely no reason to think Brother Muozone is gay. He simply has a "manservant" with him at all times. And, actually, that manservant is openly hostile toward homosexuality. Although I don't think its been explicitly stated in the show, we are supposed to think (I believe) that Muozone is Nation of Islam. The NOI is not very accepting towards homosexuality either, but they are often portrayed in the culture as being "correct" in their personal bearing, which might lead one to think of them as "fey."

Ummm, maybe I'm just an idiot, but are we sure that Stringer is dead? Sure, the police SAY he's dead, but I saw him breathing while he was on the floor "dead."

I'm still watching season 3 (I'm too cheap to pay for cable so I have to wait for the shows to come out on DVD). I have this same debate with friends, about whether The Wire is "realist" and what sort of expectations that sets up. I think the comparison with the realist novel is apt. The show is not a docudrama; it provides us with a kind of map of a highly stylized universe. In other words, Omar and Mouzone are not abberations from some kind of "realism" or verisimilitude, or whatever you want to call it. There are all kinds of "unreal" elements, big and small. Take, for a minor example, the crime scene investigation in season 1, the one in which Bunk and McNulty use only the word f**k (I'm feeling timid, for some reason). That's not "realistic," as one of my friends pointed out, complainingly. But I liked that scene. I thought it conveyed a certain . . . mood or tone, or something -- it was a kind of ode to the joy that can be derived from finely honed skills and what, for lack of a better word, I'll call teamwork. And then, on a much larger scale, there's Colvin's "legalization" of drugs. Would that ever really happen? Again, my friend disapproves. But I see it as part and parcel of the Wire universe. And tell me there wasn't something operatic about the Greeks and Frank Sobotka's murder at the end of season 2 (and that there's no relationship between that murder and the death of [industrial-age] Baltimore). More generally, the show continually highlights the parallels between the infrastructures of the police and the dealers -- this is something that may seem "realistic" to some people who tend to think along the same lines, but it's no more "real" than anything else. And the parallels between what Colvin says about the war on drugs (to Carver) and what many of us believe about the war on terror can't be a mere coincidence. Maybe this sort of reach ruins the show for some people. But I like it.

ValisJason has it right. There is a certain ghetto archetype of a super-disciplined, ruthless, true believer NOI gangster. I don't know if this is well-known in more middle-class circles, but I recognized Muozone the second I saw him.

Homicide: Life on the street had an episode in season 4 were the NOI had a contract to police the high rises.

I look forward to when the po-lice find snoop's morgue

Homicide: Life on the street had an episode in season 4 were the NOI had a contract to police the high rises.

A group called Fruits of Islam has a contract to provide security for the notorious Sursum Corda project here in DC.

As I understand it, for HBO to put HBO on Demand in HD, they would have to have a separate channel for that and Comcast would have to allot some of their bandwidth for that. I would imagine it's hard to justify the expense for now. As it is, HBO only offers its primary channel in HD.

Episode 4.2 kicks so much ass.

Petey,
I would never suggest that Tucker Carlson or Rick Santorum are not gay, secretly or otherwise -- it really is not any of my business.

Petey,
Actually, I should have gone with George Will, correct? (I was thinking of that picture Atrios had of Dandy Santorum).


Comments closed September 24, 2006.

Copyright © 2007 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.