« Mid-October Fun! | Main | Ballgazing »

Ambition as a Virtue

16 Oct 2006 10:55 pm

Maybe it's just 'cuz I'm an asshole, but I find myself a lot more sympathetic to Tommy Carcetti than a lot of Wire-watchers seem to be. It's his very cloying, grating, somewhat unprincipled ambition that, I think, makes it plausible that he'd be a good mayor. Politics is not, at the end of the day, a game in which the pure of heart are going to succeed, so you can just cross that option off your list of possibilities. What Carcetti has going for him is that he's clearly not the kind of guy who's going to be satisfied if his last job in politics is Mayor of Baltimore. To take the next step and become governor or senator and nurse vague ambitions for the White House he's going to need, on some level, to do well as mayor and improve the city. By contrast, you see a more pernicious type of politician in Clay Davis and Clarence Royce -- men who lack higher ambitions and are therefore motivated primarily by veniality.

Race, as it so often is in American politics, is extremely relevant here. The record of African-American politicians running in majority-white constituencies is depressingly bad. As a consequence, African-American politicians holding jobs -- mayor, congressman, city council, state legislature -- in majority-minority constituencies tend to face sharply constrained horizons and therefore have incentive to settle for merely venial, rather than ambitious, conduct in office to the detriment of the communities they serve. Nowadays, of course, we have rising superstar Barak Obama and if he's joined in the Senate by Harold Ford we may have something of a trend on our hands. That would be a good thing on its own terms (and, of course, anything that puts more senate seats in Democratic hands is a good thing), but I think it would be particularly beneficial in terms of breaking that particular dynamic.

Share This

Comments (26)

Maybe it's because I too am an asshole, but what are the problems with Carcetti? He sleeps around? Is there a character on the show not named Bubbles who doesn't? He's ambitious? As you point out, how is that a bad thing.

I'm pretty sympathetic to him in that he still seems to recognize the faustian bargains he's forced to make in service of political ambition. I have no doubt that his "Fuck the politics" moment in season 3 was honest, the same with his ambivalence over blowing up Hamsterdam. His reaction to finding out that he won recalls Redford in the Candidate, sort of "what now?" Though, as you point out, his higher ambitions mean he'll pursue at least the appearance of good governance.

I wonder to the what extent the perceptions of the larger constituencies (Maryland and beyond, as he said "fucking Baltimore County people") will affect what he tries to do in office...

How does your theory account for Richard Daly? Either of them.

SCMT, maybe Chicago pols are so notoriously crooked that they could never run for national office anyway?

The theory is just that there's a ceiling for African-American politicians, and that that often leads to venality, not that every white politician has boundless horizons.

My big problem with Carcetti his how he pronounces his name. As for the Daleys, I don't think anything Matt wrote precludes the possibility that white politicians will be content to run fiefdoms. As fiefdoms go, Chicago is a pretty good one, far better than Baltimore.

OK, I'm confused, and I don't think it's because I've never seen The Wire. "Veniality"? I don't get it? Do you mean "venality"? The former makes almost no sense, since veniality is a quality of a particular assortment of forgivable minor sins. Maybe there is some connection here, but its very odd to describe anyone as motivated by veniality. That would be like saying somebody is not just a felon, but motivated by "feloniousness".

So, I'm assuming you mean "venality". But it is hard to believe you really mean to assert that public officials who lack ambition for higher office - including apparently the bulk of African-American city politicians - are thereby nothing but corrupt influence-peddlers.

Unless, that is, you're an asshole.

"The record of African-American politicians running in majority-white constituencies is depressingly bad."

Back before the Voting Rights Act of the early 1980s introduced racial gerrymandering, however, the trend was positive. Tom Bradley won five terms as mayor of LA beginning in 1973, even though blacks only made up about 15% of the city. He was very nearly elected governor of California in 1982, which might have got him the Democratic VP nomination in 1984. But once the VRA was changed to mandate majority-minority districts, it encouraged ambitious black politicians to run as race men rather than to mold a record and approach more broadly appealing.

it is hard to believe you really mean to assert that public officials who lack ambition for higher office - including apparently the bulk of African-American city politicians - are thereby nothing but corrupt influence-peddlers.

Not universally, it's just about likelihood. Within the overall category "politicians", a subset will be lacking "pure civic virtue", or some such quality; a subset of these will be ambitious for higher office; and a subset of these will, motivated by their ambition, work for the benefit of their constituents so as to achieve higher office, despite being concerned primarily for themselves. If a group of politicians is effectively disqualified from office above a certain level, that motivation ceases to exist once the ceiling is hit. Doesn't have anything to do with the inherrant qualities of african-americans, politicians or otherwise, in general.

Also, mean-spirited mocking of homophone-type confusion isn't cool. Proper humor is required; othewise it's like kicking a puppy.

Kervick definitely has a sense of humor. If you go to his blog, you'll see that the top post is from 2004, and begins, "My self-imposed sabbatical is over."

Back on topic, I wasn't aware that Carcetti was disliked. He seems like one of the good guys, insofar as we have such things in The Wire--which is to say, absent substantial force in the other direction, he's more likely to do good than bad.

I thought that Tommy surprised us all by not sleeping with his campaign manager this time. His character became just a little more complex, his push in the last two weeks showed his mettle and moxie, and we even got insights to his uber-Catholic school boy naivete when he actually believed Clay Davis was not going to publicly support Royce.

Since he is not a total jerk, we can now observe the arc of his story with the same uncertainty that makes The Wire the most intelligent American TV series of all time. For sheer consistency Prime Suspect and a number of early Masterpiece Theaters still take the cake or maybe I am just showing my age.

Don't forget about Deval Patrick, the next governor of Masschusetts!

The GOP did in fact steal the presidency, twice, and the GOP is in fact right now actively working to steal the 2006 Elections. A "do everything" Republican assault on democracy used intimidation, fraud, vote theft, computer rigging, machine distribution manipulation, a fake Homeland security alert, trashing of provisional ballots, denial of a recount and dozens more "dirty tricks" to produce a 118,775 "official" margin for Bush that was an utter fiction. Exit polls in nine swing states showed Kerry a clear winner as late as 12:21 am on election night. Nationwide exit polls showed him with a 1.5 million vote margin in the popular vote. But somehow, against all statistical probability, Bush wound up with a popular vote victory of nearly 3.5 million. And somehow, against all statistical probability, he carried Ohio and three other states (Iowa, Nevada and New Mexico) where he had been the clear loser in the exit polls. Ohio alone was sufficient to give him a second term, just as Florida had been in 2000. Such an outcome is beyond implausible - unless you saw how the Rove-Blackwell machine stole the vote. The tactics the GOP perfected in Ohio 2004 are now being used in 2006 and honed for re-use in 2008. Neither the Mainstream Media or the core of the Democratic Party has been willing to face the reality that unless our entire election system immediately gets a total top-to-bottom revamp by an informed public willing to deal with the systematic poisoning of American democracy, there will be no honest elections in the US in 2006 or in 2008.


-------------------------------------------------------------

T for Texas...T for Tennessee...

(But did he have to vote for the bankruptcy bill?)

Sorry. It was Waylon for the drive home.

Maybe I should erase that blog, ogged. Iswitched to full-time blog commentator a long time ago.

Well, things are changing a bit in Newark, with Cory Booker's administration.

Maybe I should erase that blog, ogged.

But then how would we know that you have a sense of humor?

Carcetti has always had mixed motivations. He's decent enough to know what's right, and selfish and ambitious and opportunistic enough to know what works to his advantage, and he consistently tries to tack between the two. Which makes him...y'know...human. All motives are mixed; everyone is like Carcetti (with the single difference that some people are unwilling to admit it to themselves).

They have toned down the unlikeableness of Carcetti since he was introduced. He started out as a biting, smug, womanizer and thus earned my wife's scorn: "pig."

They showed one moment when Carcetti's wife and the consultant told him to tone it down, be a bit more human. Since then, biting got toned down to sharp, smug got toned down to very self-aware, and for now at least, he is done with the womanizing.

Can anyone clarify the whole primary v. general election thing? They presented the day as if it were Election Day, day off for the kids, long voting lines, but then also suggested that the vote was for the primary.

If it was the primary, will Royce pull a Lieberman and run as an Independent? (No spoilers, please. Speculation only.) That would keep the cops in turmoil for a while longer.

Can anyone clarify the whole primary v. general election thing? They presented the day as if it were Election Day, day off for the kids, long voting lines, but then also suggested that the vote was for the primary.

This was clarified in an exchange on Election night. Carcetti said something about not getting too enthusiastic, there's still the general election; everybody laughed. Somebody asked if there was even a Republican candidate.

In other words: the city is so heavily Democratic that winning the primary is (de facto) winning the general.

In other words: the city is so heavily Democratic that winning the primary is (de facto) winning the general.

I understood that comment. I did not understand how a primary election was such a major event, with the school closings, etc. Did the show take some liberties, or did I miss something?

An election is an election, isn't it? If you close the schools for election day in November, why wouldn't you also close the schools for the earlier election day that serves as the parties' primary?

I just checked the Baltimore school system website, and they do close the schools for primary election day (September 12 this year).

Wow. I was far too lazy to actually look that up. Thanks.

The actor who plays Carcetti is British, but pulls off the Baltimore accent without a flaw! It's an underated accent and my man Carcetti takes it to the hole.

The actor who plays Carcetti is British,

Irish, actually. Somewhere I read that The Wire has a big following in Ireland, partly because of Aiden Gillen.

I beleive Aiden Gillen (Carcetti) is actually Irish. If you listen closely you will hear him revert back to his native accent occasionally. Nonetheless, it's a great part and he does a great job with it. I love that mischievous look he gets in his eye, especially when he's about to do something wrong.


Comments closed October 30, 2006.

Copyright © 2007 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.