Good news, I would say. Of course the fly in the ointment is that we could have gotten a better version of this deal years and years ago had Bush and Cheney not stomped on it. The tragedy of it is that not only could we have gotten this deal years ago, but the personnel who were ready to get it have been there inside the administration all along, being overruled by the blinkered ideogues they work for.
I was joking earlier today that we should just send Christopher Hill to Teheran to try and work something out. It turns out, though, that Hill's opposite number as Assistant Secretary for Near East Affairs David Welch is another career foreign servive officer with a long record. Odds are he could do a fine job, too, were it not for the fact that, like the rest of the Cossacks, he works for a crazy Czar.


Am I the only one who thinks that, as tough as "real 'Murkins" perceive Bush & CO for doing things like this, the whole "we're willing to talk (only) so long as you get rid of your nuke program" rhetoric of Bush & CO actually sends the message of "we may have objections to your evildoing, but as long as you get rid of any nuke programs you may have, we'll gladly make any sort of compromise", which makes us actually look super-afraid (of nukes) rather than making us look strong and invites (c.f. criticism of farm subsidies) countries to have nuclear programs that way they can use them as negotiating tools?
E.g. before Bush & CO didn't wanna play ball (at least over the table) with "axis of evil" member Iran, but now that they act like they have a nuclear program, our Sec. of State is willing to talk with her Iranian counter-part anywhere and anytime so long as they get rid of that program? What a message to send, nu?
Posted by DAS | February 13, 2007 1:54 PM