Didn't President Bush promise to ban this sort of thing a few years back? I mean, seriously, a sheep with human organs? Admittedly, only 15 percent human, but still.
« Dual Loyalties Again | Main | Makiya »
The Rise of the Sheep-People
26 Mar 2007 02:08 pm
Comments (30)
My understanding is that:
Putting animal genes in people: BANNED!
Putting human genes in animals: A-OKAY!
" I've always wanted to wear their clothing."
Ba-dump-bump. Neil will be here all week, folks. Remember to tip your waitresses well.
But seriously, as a stop-gap solution, I'd recommend picking up a few sweaters at Old Navy. All the comfort with none of the hybridization.
I like sheep-pussy the way it is. If I wanted human pussy, I'd bathe and brush my teeth and maybe buy a car.
About time if you ask me.
I was a bit pessimistic about the state of technology and advancement. But with the exciting advent of the robotic cyborg arm for amputees and now this technology allowing for the best aspect combinations of all of god's creatures, the future seems limitless.
I don't know if I agree that this is such a clear cut case. There are a lot of people waiting for organs and if it's possible to "grow" human organs in other animals, perhaps the research should be carried out.
It might wind up saving a lot of lives.
Matthew, are you a regular reader of CBN news or you just have a Google-Alert set for "sheep hybrids"?
What's the problem?
I think this is an example of how people have ethical problems with certain bioengineering without having a clear argument for why. It's like cloning. What's the big deal (besides overpopulation, I suppose)? Why is having people walking around with the exact genetic data of others a problem? We already have those, identical twins. People seem to have problems with the possible uses of clones-- we'll raise a clone army! We'll harvest their organs!-- but I don't ever seem to hear a compelling argument against the creation of humans through cloning per se.
Likewise, this. What's the problem? It's a little creepy, sure, and if you are an animal rights activist, I understand that you would have a problem with it. But I don't see why this is anymore of a problem than using (noncloned) animals in other experiments.
Didn't President Bush promise to ban this sort of thing a few years back?
Apparently, that promise was chimerical.
Identical twins do not have identical dna.
Best to ask some questions before ordering the lamp kidneys at your local gourmet restaurant. Is eating a part-human illegal like cannibalism?
There are some good humanitarian arguments for this process if it leads to better transplanted organs, but some very good scientific (biological, virological) arguments why this a potentially hazardous process that could threaten not just one person, but humankind. The careful balances between species and their parasites like bacteria, and viruses has evolved over 100's of millions of years, and we really don't have any scientific idea what we are playing with.
There are other benefits of stem cell research (of all kinds) that seem much less fraught with danger.
Researchers will do things if they see possibly interesting results. It is up to society to put on the brakes when the overall benefits and downsides need to be balanced.
This just does not sound to me like a very good idea at this stage of our understanding in biology and genetics. There are human diseases that could also be introduced into animal populations without detection that scare me. Would you like your HIV-laden beef cooked medium or rare?
Identical twins do not have identical dna.
I am far from an expert on this, but I always thought that was the case. Wikipedia (admittedly an imperfect source) says
"Although their traits and physical appearances are not exactly the same due to environmental conditions in both the womb and outside the womb, they do have the same DNA."
Nobody f's with the manimal lobby.
"Sheep-People"? I believe you mean "sheeple."
Oh what a tangled web we weave.
Firstly, I hope that was a tongue in cheek comment about Bush.
Secondly, at what point does an animal with human engineered parts become a "human"? I can sense the lawyers out there licking their chops now.
"at what point does an animal with human engineered parts become a 'human'?"
When he or she says so.
The really sobering thing is that, at 15%, the sheep is one-third more human than Dick Cheney.
Hey sheep boy, is it true your dad is human?
Na-a-a-a-a-a-a
Anyone remember "O Lucky Man"?
mmm, chops!
Will the sheep get to host an MTV nostalgia show about the '80s?
At last, the Fundies will see a Lion lie down with a Lamb, only to see the "manimals" proceed to copulate using their human genitalia and give birth to the terrifying fleecy-maned hybrid known as Malcolm Gladwell!
Identical twins have identical DNA. Deal with it.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20070326/sc_livescience/raresemiidenticaltwinsdiscovered;_ylt=AovilSsdvmHjaJ8OoxqkX3gDW7oF
Rare Semi-Identical Twins Discovered
LiveScience Staff
LiveScience.com Mon Mar 26, 10:01 AM ET
Twins can be identical, fraternal and apparently semi-identical, scientists now report.
ADVERTISEMENT
Researchers discovered twins who are identical on their mom's side of the equation but share only half their genes from dad.
Here's how it happened: Two sperm cells fertilized one egg—an event assumed to be very rare—then split into two embryos.
"Their similarity is somewhere between identical and fraternal twins," said geneticist Vivienne Souter, of the Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center in Phoenix, Arizona. "It makes me wonder whether the current classification of twins is an oversimplification."
The finding, detailed in the Journal of Human Genetics, was reported today by news@nature.com, the online site of the journal Nature.
Identical twins are created when one fertilized egg splits into two embryos. They share the same placenta and are always of the same sex. Fraternal twins result from two eggs being fertilized at the same time, each by a different sperm. Each has its own placenta, and they can be the same sex or not.
The semi-identical twins only came to the attention of Souter and her colleagues because one had ambiguous genitalia. The child was born a "true hermaphrodite" with both ovarian and testicular tissue. The other twin is a male, anatomically.
The twins are now toddlers, according to the report. They were conceived and born normally and appear to be mentally normal and are growing normally.
I enjoyed Anderson's take. Work in a shotgun blast to an old man's face and this might just be the Yglesias Comedy thread of the year.
I'm more worried about the prospect of people with brains that are 15% sheep DNA. Oh, wait...
Didn't President Bush promise to ban this sort of thing a few years back?
Someone reminded him: sheeple vote GOP!
I, for one, welcome our new sheeple overlords.
Everyone else is either too baaaaad or too aaaaaaaaaapathetic for my liking.
I find the concern about mutating viruses more than a little amusing. A virus mutating to adapt to a "new organism" is basically proto-evolution. But wait, there's no evolution! God must be directing the virus to mutate.
Comments closed April 09, 2007.
| 
Heads in the Sand
Wow! I can't wait for there to be human-sheep hybrids. I've always wanted to wear their clothing.
Posted by Neil the Ethical Werewolf | March 26, 2007 2:10 PM