« Goodman League | Main | Spitzer Sort of Backs Down »

Storm World

27 Jul 2007 06:39 pm

stormworld.jpg

I'm never really sure when the best time to post about people's books is, but since the book party for Chris Mooney's Storm World: Hurricanes, Politics, and the Battle Over Global Warming is beginning very soon, I figure this is as good a time as any. When Chris' first book, The Republican War on Science, came out one common line of response was "well, aren't liberals just as bad." The new book is, in a sense, a rebuttal to that. This isn't, in short, a prolemic about how global warming is causing massive hurricanes and coal interests are responsible for the destruction of New Orleans.

Instead, it's a very serious, measured, thoughtful, interesting look at complicated issues in play here, where the science isn't always perfectly clear nor is it always clear how scientists ought to behave when a pressing political issue impinges on an area where scientists know something about the issue, but there's also a great deal of uncertainty. Personally, I like reading science books more than I like reading political books (in part, obviously, because I read and talk about politics all day anyway), but Chris' book combines genres in the best possible way.

Share This

Comments (12)

it's a very serious, measured, thoughtful, interesting look

Nowadays I can never read sentences like that without thinking of "its a very serious, thoughtful, argument that has never been made in such detail or with such care".

Intending no reflection on Chris Mooney's book(s), I agree with Freddie that the phrase this blog proprietor chose to employ has certain resonances, and I imediately suspected sarcasm (and did not detect and upon further consideration).

Ironically, I think it was this blog that started the (fully justified) meme; at least, this is where I first encountered it.

I'm curious about your take on Kim Stanley Robinson's global warming trilogy, particularly the first one, "Forty Signs of Rain". It would seem to be right up a policy wonk's alley.

Instead, it's a very serious, measured, thoughtful, interesting look at complicated issues in play here, where the science isn't always perfectly clear nor is it always clear how scientists ought to behave when a pressing political issue impinges on an area where scientists know something about the issue, but there's also a great deal of uncertainty.

Let me guess! Chris Mooney is "non-political"... and only tends to 'lean' 'slightly' towards the Democrats.

Chris Mooney is a senior correspondent for The American Prospect and he is the author of "The Republican War on Science"...

Thus, he must also be the ideal person to untangle all the "uncertainty"...

interesting look at complicated issues

where the science isn't always perfectly clear

nor is it always clear how scientists ought to behave

but there's also a great deal of uncertainty

Meanwhile, I keep hearing that it's 'indisputable'!

Meanwhile, I keep hearing that it's 'indisputable'!

Don't be a horse's patootie.

The subject of the book is the relationship between Global Warming and hurricanes. It looks almost certain that Global Warming will lead to stronger hurricanes (the increase in SST), but the question of increased numbers is uncertain. 2005 had a bizarre, record number of hurricanes, but there are other factors besides SST that could be a constraint on numbers of storms.

AlGore's sweaty backfat

Yes, Al Gore is fat. Fatty Fatstein. Fat fat fat.

No, Chris Mooney does not write for news organs approved by party authorities. Don't worry, I won't tell anyone about your readings outside party doctrine.

I, too, couldn't help but think of our dimwitted friend when reading the 'thoughtful, serious' line. Fired up the comments to get in a suitably pithy response, only to find myself beaten there twice over. And I thought I was being clever; wonder if there's a term for that sort of intellectual sheepishness. :p

This is indeed a solid book, and worth reading. A more detailed discussion of it by climate scientists can be found here:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/06/storm-world/

For those with interest.

After 25 years in book publishing I can tell you, it's simple: Write about a new book on or slightly after the announced publication date. That is about 4 weeks after the books arrive in the publisher's warehouse, which means there's a good chance books are in stores--so if anyone reads your comments and wants to buy they book, they should be able to do so.

Lysenko-

Yes, Al Gore is fat. Fatty Fatstein. Fat fat fat.

Much like GWB is "dumb"! The absolute dummiest dumbster of all history! I'm saying dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb!

(except when he was the "evil genius" who hired Karl Rove and was personally responsible for the destructrion of the WTC and also 'stealing' both Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004)...

Meanwhile---

Al Gore's left butt cheek is still three times larger than my head!

Can you say, "Fat fucking pig?"

(not to mention his "oversized" 'carbon footprint' which is about 40x larger than 'necessary'...)

I'll bet "Tipper" has an opinion about "Fat Al"... Then again, she probably hasn't gotten laid since the last time AlGore saw his own dick without a mirror.

I'm guessing 1997...

As a "troll", I should probably mention a prominent 'lefty' who was apparently too fucking dumb to merely "drop the fork-- and step away from the table..."

RIP, Steve Gilliard.

I think "O-Chub" might want to pay attention...


Comments closed August 10, 2007.

Copyright © 2008 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.