« How I Learned International Relations | Main | Partisanship and the Reverse »

Paperful Office

14 Aug 2007 11:04 am

It became fashionable at some point to deride people who ever supposed that the rise of modern information technology would reduce the quantity of paper floating about. And, indeed, some predictions on this score were naive. Still, it's always astounding to me to read an actual description of how administrative tasks used to be performed. Here, for example, is Peter Hart in Mich: The Real Michael Collins describing the Post Office Savings Bank office where Collins had his first job:

Here, 1,600 or so women and 500 boy clerks kept track of every single deposit and withdrawal in the United Kingdon. The daily flow of paper was astonishing and intricate. Notices of withdrawal and deposits arrived from account-holders and postmasters all over the country, by post and telegram. Every change had to be individually checked and noted in the ledgers (Hannie's job for many years), which were themselves checked every quarter against the Postmaster Returns. Deposit books -- all 8 million of them -- were sent in once a year for double-checking. Withdrawals were sorted and counted in the Sorting Branch, wherre they were then divided into sixty warrant divisions and divided again into large and small amounts. The senior sorters would enter them on lists and pass them on to the Warrant Brance. Here declarations corresponding to the notices would be taken out form lockers, and the two together would be forwarded on in branches of sixty in special pouches. Deposit dockets hit the Sorting Branch just after the withdrawals departed, to be stamped with the date, passed to the Daily Balance Branch, noted, and passed back to the sorters, who sorted them to Book Office order and rerouted them to the Paying Office, which gave them back to the sorters, who stamped each docket with its division number before handing them on to the Acknowledgement Inquiry section, which would write them up and, of course, ship them all back to the beleaguered Sorting Branch, where they were released again into the world. Every move was timed, and everything had to move on time or the whole machine would fail. The pressure was intense: to begin with, withdrawal notices had to be out of the Sorting Branch by 9:47 AM.

Collins' job was to address envelopes. At least seventy an hour (on average), seven hours a day, five and a half days a week. My mother, meanwhile, used to have a job at Newsweek that I think involved, among other things, physically cutting photgraphs with her collection of extremely sharp knives and sundry straight-edges.

Share This

Comments (8)

What's even more amazing is that, apparently, mail delivery in those inefficient days was twice-daily. In most cities, one could write a letter to one's friend in town and get an answer back that same afternoon.

In some aspects, the change has resulted in less paper. Consider, for example, the printed business forms industry - formerly a thriving subset of the printing industry. It's current employment is less than half of what it was 10 years ago. Not all manufacturing jobs get outsourced. Some just completely disappear.

I can't find a reference at the moment, but I seem to recall that for a period during the 60's the New York Stock Exchange was running on a four day week because they needed three days of no trading to catch up on the paperwork.

It's very remarkable if you watch the film version of "All the President's Men" - at one point Woodward hears the name "Ken Dahlberg" and he has to search through an entire shelf of phone books to find who it is; he even has a research assistant go through the paper archives to find news clippings. Nowadays we would just use Google.

And of course, who could forget - carbon paper!

I'm far too young to have much experience with carbon paper, but I do fondly recall telling my father a joke about carbon paper I found on the Internets. Something to the effect of: "Six carbon copies is the limit of any man's ego".

The only reason we don't have a paperless office today is that we...still have too much paper from the past and the present.

That is, a lot of things are still done, mostly for historical reasons, but partly for inadequate technology reasons, on paper that don't need to be.

A couple years ago, any indication of a signature on a digital contract was made legally enforceable. But I and many people still like a paper contract with a signature on it.

Another issue is that we have a lot of problems converting existing paper into digital formats. Scanners and optical character recognition still suck and will continue to do so until better AI is developed.

Also, mobility is an issue. It's easy to carry around a USB key but harder to carry something that someone can sign that way. eBook readers still suck, for example.

This stuff will get straightened out over the next few decades, especially when nanotech gets more play. Paper has been around for centuries, why expect it to go away in ten or twenty years just because we have PCs?

We still need hard copies of many, if not most things - electronic stuff is too easily enronned.

Anyone remember those giant paper spreadsheets we used to use? They'd cover half a small desk


Comments closed August 28, 2007.

Copyright © 2007 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.