Does Glenn Reynolds really not understand that this Romanesko item is tongue in cheek?
« "Our Side" | Main | Offseason Basketblogging »
Question of the Day
23 Aug 2007 11:24 am
Comments (13)
I bet my bot has a nicer butt than your bot.
Time for an Online Hotness Contest Ethics Panel!
He is the king of willful ignorance.
How is it tongue in cheek? Seems like a straightforward account by Romanesko.
What I really like is that he seems to be regarding it as an example of media perfidy and lack of ethics. Given the identity of the malfactors (hey, it wasn't me -- I can't run bots from my work computer) shouldn't it be an example of bloggy perfidy?
I think Reynolds is the dumbest and least self-aware blogger out there except for maybe Roger L. Simon.
No.
"Media credibility takes another hit" -- File under tongue, cheek.
You can play dumb all you want, Al, but the guys around here aren't going to find it attractive.
'wingers have no sense of humor.
This is the American Idol of journalism. If they network and capitalize properly, those two hot youngsters will end up at the Times!
'wingers have no sense of humor.Au contraire. I thought Reynolds' "I once had a girlfriend" bit was hilarious.
When you're Glenn Reynolds, any item, no matter how insignificant or tongue-in-cheek, that's evidence of a lying media is worth respect, and any evidence, no matter how overwhelming, of the failure of the Iraq war is evidence that the media lies.
Comments closed September 06, 2007.
| 
Heads in the Sand
the really QOTD: do you really need to ask?
insty can be really thick when the facts don't correspond to what he wants them to be. remeber when he spent months saying that he just didn't understand the valerie plame matter?
Posted by upyernoz | August 23, 2007 11:40 AM