« Nuking Pakistan | Main | Ground Truth »

The Markos Factor

03 Aug 2007 06:47 am

Markos

I ran into the Great Orange Satan himself (pictured) yesterday in the early evening, and he was at pains to point out that the YearlyKos Convention has only a loose association with the DailyKos blog (YearlyKos Executive Director Gina Cooper is also a DailyKos fellos) and nothing in particular to do with Markos himself.

Indeed, it's not even totally clear to me that's there's an especially logical or organic connection to bloggers and blogging in play here. Obviously, that's the causal origin of the gathering. But bloggers are interested in the issues, and an awful lot of what's going on here is just around issues -- foreign policy, telecom policy, education, church/state issues, whatever -- issues that activists care about whether on- or off-line. It seems to me that this confab is probably going to evolve over time in a more generic direction and be something like an inverse CPAC rather than something closely linked with a particular subculture.

Share This

Comments (7)

Well, for people who are interested in this sort of thing, blogs stopped being interesting just for their mere existence a while ago. Yep, they allow you to write about lots of stuff, in real time, and hear feedback. But we're all familiar with that now. You couldn't write a breathless book called "Blog!" now, any more than you could write "The Radio!" or "The Electricity-Powered Home!"

I guess there's a few panel discussions to be had about group blogging vs. blogging for a larger institution vs. individual blogging, and how blogs influence the wider world, and how what unites and divides Left Blogistan.

But blogs are neat because they allow you to learn about and discuss interesting stuff, so it's not surprising that the content is what people want to discuss.

I have to say, I hate Daily Kos. I'm all liberal, etc., but maybe it's because I'm an elitist. I don't know. I think it may be that people who are progressive but wary of the Democratic party dislike a blog that is so narrowly focused on electing Democrats.

I think it may be that people who are progressive but wary of the Democratic party dislike a blog that is so narrowly focused on electing Democrats.

Maybe Nader will run again for y'all. Gawd knows that worked out well the last time.

I actually think that YearlyKos (or what it will become in the future) might be more interesting and inclusive if it were not misnamed "Kos."

I don't regularly visit DailyKos anymore and hence was less interested in attending a YearlyKos convention. It's only now that I'm finding out how not-quite-DailyKos this convention really was.

Most conferences & conventions need some sort of formal (or at least natural) membership to attend, and YKos is no different. Obviously most of the speakers, panelists, etc., aren't Kossacks in any meaningful way, but the DKos community is the core group of attendees. You may not like DKos, but the organizers have to start somewhere, and they shouldn't have to search out every self-described independent in Left Blogistan either.

And for someone so often described as a bully, petty despot, etc., I find Kos to be rather humble about his personal influence, always giving full credit to other bloggers & the comunity itself. He can be blunt or even obnoxious in his postings, but that doesn't necessarily mean he really is The Great Orange Satan.

Latts,
You do know that most people(Faux viewers excluded) call Kos, "The Great Orange Satan" as snark, right? And do you know why that is?

JKC: yes, I know that. I was mostly speaking to the people who turn their ever-so-refined noses up at DKos, and the general perception that it is a lowest-common-denominator, rabble-rousing mess led by an ill-mannered demagogue. Out of 130K users, there are plenty I think are complete assholes-- Clinton supporters are pissing me off these days-- but the success of the place is still quite an accomplishment.


Comments closed August 17, 2007.

Copyright © 2008 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.