« I Guess It's Not "Gotcha" Journalism | Main | "Tell Tell Tell" »

The White Supremacist Caucus

26 Nov 2007 09:38 am

JohnCStennis.jpg

One thing that occurred to me when reading Robert Fleegler's essay on "Theodore G. Bilbo and the Decline of. Public Racism, 1938-1947" was to look into how succeeded Bilbo as US Senator from Mississippi. The answer turned out to be John Stennis, one of twentieth century America's most admired white supremacists, whose legacy as a titan of the appropriations process is celebrated through such landmarks as the USS John C. Stennis aircraft carrier and the John C. Stennis Space Center. Stennis was, early in his career, ahead of his time as an advocate of torture:

As a prosecutor, he sought the conviction and execution of three black men whose murder confessions had been extracted by torture. The convictions were overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark case of Brown v. Mississippi (1936) that banned the use of evidence obtained by torture. The transcript of the trial indicates Stennis was fully aware of the methods of interrogation, including flogging, used to gain confessions.

Having gained a reputation in the 1930s as the kind of guy who didn't mind torturing confessions out of black defendants, Stennis was a natural to succeed Bilbo in the Senate. There he signed the Southern Manifesto in support of school segregation, opposed the civil rights legislation of the 1950s, opposed the Civil Rights Act, opposed the Voting Rights Act, and broke with the Democratic Party in 1964 to support Barry Goldwater since Goldwater was a civil rights opponents. His colleague in the Senate during this period was James Eastland, who was prone to saying things like this in the mid-1950s:

The Southern institution of racial segregation or racial separation was the correct, self-evident truth which arose from the chaos and confusion of the Reconstruction period. Separation promotes racial harmony. It permits each race to follow its own pursuits, and its own civilization. Segregation is not discrimination… Mr. President, it is the law of nature, it is the law of God, that every race has both the right and the duty to perpetuate itself. All free men have the right to associate exclusively with members of their own race, free from governmental interference, if they so desire.

When Stennis and Eastland eventually failed in their quest to uphold white supremacy, they didn't find themselves turned out of office by new biracial coalitions. Nor did they retire and fade quietly from the scene, embarrassed by their longtime record of support for apartheid and terrorist violence. Instead, both remained members in good standing of the Democratic Party, with Stennis re-elected in 1982, 1976, 1970, and 1964 before retiring in 1988 and Eastland re-elected in 1966 and 1972 in 1978.

And of course while noplace is ever quite like Mississippi, the basic pattern is fairly typical. All across the South, avowed white supremacist politicians tended to stick around well into the 1970s and 1980s under a kind of pact where they agreed to keep quiet about things like how segregation "the correct, self-evident truth" and others would agree to ignore their records. I think the "shocked, shocked" reaction that a lot of people seem to have to the idea that Ronald Reagan's consistent habit of taking the segregationist side on controversial issues might reflect some kind of racism needs to be put into this context. When Reagan was running for President in 1976 and 1980 there were tons of politicians with much worse records safely ensconced in the elite and the persistence of very conservative Democrats in important legislative leadership positions was the cornerstone of the era of bipartisan dealmaking whose demise is always being lamented. Things look very different from a perspective of thirty years later.

Share This

Comments (41)

The persistence of these dinosaurs in the Democratic Party was probably due to Congressional seniority. Had they bolted to the Republican Party, they'd have become freshmen all over again. With de jure integration gone and de facto working so well, the only thing left for them to do was to milk the federal teat for all it was worth. That took seniority. Once the dinos retired, their ideas were absorbed completely into the Republican Party.

Things look very different, huh? Robert Byrd and Trent Lott both seem securely ensconced in their party's elite.

Things look very different, huh? Robert Byrd and Trent Lott both seem securely ensconced in their party's elite.

Since Byrd long ago renounced his past, I'd say, "Go! and never darken my towels again."

Byrd trolling is senile.

Jeffrey's point cuts both ways -- staying Dem was good for Stennis and Eastland, and certainly also the Dems didn't want to lose their votes in the Senate.

Also, FWIW, Stennis grew more moderate in his later years, unlike Eastland.

Every breath that Robert Byrd draws reduces the number he has left by a significant amount. May he realize in his final moments what a monster he was and feel remorse.

Trent Lott still has a way to fall, though, before he is able to see himself for what he is, and was. Given his level of pride, there's no doubt his fall will continue to be dramatic and public. His life too, will end, and I'm sure those two lions of racism will meet again.

Eastland was not reelected in 1978. He died earlier in the year, and Thad Cochran won the seat in November.

I figured the over/under for a mention of Byrd was two comments.

Honest people of good faith can reasonably disagree about whether flogging is torture.

Image what is going to happen after the Republican Party collapses and the U.S. is left with one political party. The only way to increase the power of a state or district is to keep re-electing the same person.

What happens in an election is over half of the incumbents are re-elected without opposition? The U.S. should be there somewhere between 2014 and 2020.

Extreme torturing in defense of even more extreme torturing is no vice.

-- U.S. Congress.

Trent Lott "securely ensconced"? Not so much.

Image what is going to happen after the Republican Party collapses and the U.S. is left with one political party.

We can worry about it if it happens. I'd argue we're better off with one secular constitutionalist party than with two parties, one of which is flat-out theocratic authoritarian.

Funny how the "Byrd was a racist" trolls are always all, themselves, racists.

... Fascinating, Captain ...

Radio transcript from January 21, 1973...

It’s 5 pm.

In the top of the News, Senator John Stennis underwent a lengthy operation at Walter Reed Army Medical Center after he was shot during a hold up in front of his Washington home today.

The surgery was for the removal of two bullets, one from the Senator’s chest, and one from his left leg.

A hospital spokesman says that Stennis’ condition is listed as stable.

White House News Secretary Ronald Ziegler says that President Nixon has been informed of the shooting, and has instructed the FBI to assist in every possible way.

A 1971 law makes it a federal crime to assault or kidnap or kill a member of Congress.

Stennis, who entered the Senate in 1947, is Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Police spokesman say the 71 year-old Mississippi Democrat was shot as he stepped from his car in front of his home.

They say the assailants got Stennis’ gold watch, wallet, and 25 cents in change.

The Senator reportedly offered no resistance to his assailants, and, after being shot, crawled fifty feet to his house, where his wife called the police.

Police say they are searching for two black men in connection with the shooting.

And Robert Byrd is an unrepentant segregationist, right? And a racist, right? And the evidence for this is ... ?

By the way, Wikipedia tells us: "In the ... NAACP['s] Congressional Report Card for the 108th Congress ..., Byrd was awarded with an approval rating of 100% for favoring the NAACP's position in all 33 bills presented to the United States Senate regarding issues of their concern. ... In June 2005, Byrd[45] proposed an additional $10 million in federal funding for the Martin Luther King memorial in Washington, D.C., remarking that 'With the passage of time, we have come to learn that his Dream was the American Dream, and few ever expressed it more eloquently.'"

On the other hand, Lott, in this very decade, was praising the halcyon days of Strom Thurmond's "States' Rights Democratic Party" in 1948, and in 1980, Reagan started his campaign praising "States' Rights" in Neshoba County, Mississippi.

On the third hand, anybody remember the Army-McCarthy hearings? Maybe you saw "Point of Order"? That pretty sane guy in the middle of the Democrats was Stennis. McCarthy make him look like a liberal.

Something no one talks about regarding Reagan is that his reaching out to white racists also directly correlated with school busing which was causing white flight all over America - busing started about 71-72 in my area. The first three years of it were really bad and in my hometown they are still referred to as the riot years. Republican's "states rights" coded messages would have resonated with many families during this turbulent time in American public schools.

WTF, HBinBoston? How about giving us your interpretation of that event? Compare, contrast with George Wallace's experience, maybe? Or just get lost.

It's time for typo trolling, now.

noplace is ever quite like Mississippi

If by "noplace," you mean the English literal translation of "utopia," then I must disagree. Utopia is ever not at all like Mississippi.

If by "noplace," you mean "nowheresville," then you are certainly correct.

Sorry, y'all, I couldn't resist.

Well as long as you are bemoaning segregation-era Southerners who have Nimitz-class carriers named after them, do you happen to know if Carl Vinson was any better/worse on these issues? Or do we have 2 of our most powerful warships named after men like Stennis?

The rancid metaphysics and psuedo science that informs contemporary racists is worse, in many respects, than the old fashioned squalor that Stennis et al mucked around in. .

The racists do dislike Byrd - Not just for his repentence, but because they see him the way rogue lawmen in NY saw Persico.

Old-time racism was because the Bible tells us so. New-style racism is about teh science. Another logic mash-up from the folks who want to declare a zygote fully human while holding to the conviction that Eve started out as a spare rib.

Armand, Wikipedia says Vinson signed the Southern Manifesto and was a life-long segregationist. In short, yes, "we have 2 of our most powerful warships named after men like Stennis."

I think the Byrd trolls are a good thing, by the way. They make clear that the old racial attitudes are completely disreputable, even among conservative idiots. It is a shame, however, that these trolls, unlike Byrd, cling to the "rancid metaphysics and psuedo science" of current racist-consevatism, noted above.

HBinBoston dint like that "forced bussin' ... "

The racists do dislike Byrd - Not just for his repentence, but because they see him the way rogue lawmen in NY saw Persico.

Um...Serpico?

Yes - Serpico. Not Carmine Persico. Byrd as Serpico. Who would have predicted that?

This thread has obviously caused Lott to announce his retirement.

I meant to include this link with above:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/26/lott.resign/

It was an interesting coincidence. Who can deny that?

yes, I brought up Byrd and Lott because I was a racist. Because, you know, us racists have nothing better to do than go around exposing old racists and pointing out that they shouldn't be in positions of power.

My understanding of Stennis is that, while he was a staunch segregationist, he wasn't a race-baiting demagogue like Bilbo or his colleague Eastland. He was one of the "respectable" segregationists like Richard Russell, who mostly talked in code words about the Southern way of life and states' rights, rather than ranting about miscegenation. And my impression is that he mostly abandoned his racist views by the end of his career.

The supporting Goldwater in 1964 was a specifically Missisippi thing. The regular Democratic delegation from Mississippi had walked out of the Democratic convention in 1964 when the chair ruled that the integrated Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party had to be given some of the seats of the Mississippi delegation. The party as a whole then went on to support Goldwater as retribution. It was Stennis being a party man, rather than the opposite.

So, anyway, Stennis=not good, but he's clearly a very different breed from the Bilbos of the world. Not necessarily a more admirable one.

And my impression is that he mostly abandoned his racist views by the end of his career.

That is the general view down here in the Magnolia State.

Byrd's always a fun one to point to because the old coot is still there.

I don't know that I'd single out Stennis regarding the respectful treatment of old-time segregationists. As John points out above, Richard Russell is probably an even better example. He has a Senate office building named after him.

As for other generally-admired Senators with this baggage, two that I can think of right off the bat are J. William Fulbright and Sam Ervin.

yes, I brought up Byrd and Lott because I was a racist. Because, you know, us racists have nothing better to do than go around exposing old racists and pointing out that they shouldn't be in positions of power.

It's so highly unlikely that you didn't know that Byrd had repudiated his Klan past that you're not going to be able to salvage this one.

Critics of Byrd are usually Republicans. You do the math.

I'll do the math that all Republicans are racists? and that critics of Lott are also necessarily Republican (and racist)?
yep, making lots of sense here...

plus, the fact that byrd now genuflects to the NAACP matters to me not a whit.
he was a member of the KLAN. the KLAN. yes, the same group that used to hang up black people.
and y'all have been giving reagan shit for talking about federalism...

Hugo Black, who was probably one of the most militant justices on the Warren court on overturning segregation, also was a member of the Klan in his twenties. There is such a thing a redemption, when a person has a moment and hears the voice in the light on the road to Damascus. Byrd has supported the 1991 Civil Rights Amendments and other bills. His case is distinct for the Eastlands their successors in the Republican party such as Eastland's former aide, Trent Lott, who believed segregation was the way things ought to be.

An interesting book is waiting to be written (or maybe already has been for all I know) on the abandonment of segregationism by white Southern politicians in the 1970s. One could argue (and of course many have) that many politicians continued to use racist "codewords" and so forth, and there is a great deal of truth in this, but the nation fortunately avoided an alternate history in which leading white Southerners continued to act as their forebears had during Reconstruction or as they themselves had from 1954 to 1970, refusing to accept the Brown decision and subsequent developments as legitimate and constantly attempting to restore legally established white supremacy. Instead, by the late 1970s, few politicians openly called for the restoration of de jure segregation.

Part of this is because Old Guard members like Harry Byrd and Richard Russell left the scene and a new generation (such as, for all his flaws, Jimmy Carter) came to prominence, but partly it is because, as Matt says, an implicit agreement was struck in which elderly segregationist politicians stopped supporting segregation (whether or not their private views had changed, which they probably had in some cases and probably had not in others) and the rest of the political world ignored the fact they had ever been segregationists. This was true of Strom Thurmond as well as of those of his peers like Stennis and Russell Long who had remained Democrats - Thurmond voted for renewal of the Voting Rights Act in 1982 and for the Martin Luther King holiday in 1983, even though he had been calling King a Communist fewer than two decades earlier. At the same time, with a few exceptions like George Wallace, none of these men admitted their former position had been wrong; they just pretended the whole thing had never happened.

I am not saying in the least that Stennis (let alone Thurmond, a truly creepy guy who in addition to his segregationism was apparently one of the worst womanizers of all time) was a good guy who should be let off the hook for his previous actions and statements, but this evolution was an important development that is worth taking note off.

P.S. It would be a pretty cool symbolic move if Governor Barbour appointed Charles Evers as to fill out the last year of Lott's term. He may be 85, but that is five years younger than Byrd, only one year older than Stevens, and only two years older than the two Hawaii Senators, and he could be a caretaker for a year while younger politicians jockey to fill the seat in 2008. I don't expect this to happen, but if it does, you heard it here first.

The racists hate Byrd - But it's not just the Serpico effect. It's due primarily to his to his public repentence and his embrace of civil rights.

In addition, Byrd was a lonely heroic voice against the Iraq war. A prophet is not without honor ...

One of the wonderful things about many political blogs is that, in their mania to label everything "conservative" as evil, so-called "liberals" sling their vile slop far and wide. (That's not to say that conservative bloggers aren't often a mirror image.)

Goldwater opposed the Civil Rights act, saying that racism would die a slow, painful, natural death, which it is in the process of doing. He knew that legislation has its limits. While I don't entirely agree with this point of view, at the same time I have a problem with JFK/LBJ's brand of cynicism on the subject as well.

On the other hand, Reagan's so-called siding with the "racists" sho-nuff hepped keep them Nigras out of public office in the south, dinnit? Must be why big cities like Atlanta seem to have dealt with the race issue so well while big cities like Detroit and St. Louis, thanks to court-ordered busing, have become enclaves which are rotting from the core out! Yup.

Gee, it must be difficult to have such a a monochromatic view of politics and life! But I bet it's a lot more fun.

Since most people are morally ambiguous--which is merely to say that they are more complex than they are usually painted--it would seem that mature folks might start thinking in a more complex way.

At its core, the ongoing Southern evangelical movement is racist. Witness the transition from Bible belt Dixiecrat to "Red State" Republican. This notwithstanding the Southern Baptist Church's repudiation of women's equality via their dictum of a wife's "subservient" role to a husband.

DP:Reagan's "so-called " siding with the rascists?
Like he didn't????
As if the different trajectories of the cities you mentioned were due somehow to some obscure benevolence of the Reagan presidency? What planet are you watching from?


Comments closed December 10, 2007.

Copyright © 2008 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.