You need to scroll down a bit to read it, but Colin Kahl has a letter to the editor in USA Today about Michael O'Hanlon mischaracterizing Barack Obama's views on Iraq.
« Opportunities | Main | The Feminist Case for Obama »
Kahl vs. O'Hanlon
17 Mar 2008 10:26 am
Comments (2)
is it really necessary in this day and age to anticipatorily preempt possible but unlikely complaints you might get from readers regarding the need to scroll down half a page in order to read the target passage from a link?
Comments closed March 31, 2008.

This is becoming a Holmes/Moriarity deal between Matt and O'Hanlon.
In this case, I think O'Hanlon's enough of a 'ho to evade Matt's charge. He's not going to intentionally "mischaracterize" the views of anyone who may be president. On the other hand, Matt could easily mischaracterize O'Hanlon, and vice versa.
Posted by Robert Powell | March 17, 2008 10:51 AM