« Mapping "Area Codes" | Main | The Cost of Egotism »

Rapture Ready

10 Mar 2008 09:48 am

I had only managed to read a few pages of my advance copy of Daniel Radosh's Rapture Ready!: Adventures in the Parallel Universe of Christian Pop Culture before it turned out that my girlfriend, the lovely and talented Sara Mead, had snagged it for myself. Fair enough, I thought, she can have it, but only if she agrees to write a review for my blog! The nefarious plot worked:

I think Matt thought I'd gone a little crazy the day I started reading Daniel Radosh's new book Rapture Ready, because I kept breaking into hysterical laughter every couple minutes. As someone who grew up on the border between mainline and evangelical protestantism, I recognized a lot of the more ridiculous elements of Christian pop culture Radosh's book highlights--but even 100% secular people will find plenty of things to crack them up here (see, for instance: Testamints, Heritage USA, "Jesus is my Girlfriend" music, The Christian Eminem). Making fun of Christain pop culture is easy--there's a lot that deserves to be made fun of. What makes Rapture Ready worthwhile is that Radosh--a secular Jew--goes beyond mockery to engage seriously with Christian believers who make, consume, and even criticize Christian pop culture, to explore what it means to them and the broader social implications of the existing Christian pop culture sector.

Radosh's exploration of Christian pop culture brings him in contact with some serious hot button issues--abstinence only education, creationism--and he offers some sharp observations on them. But I found the book most interesting when Radosh gets away from the political to engage with individual Christians about their lives as believers. Our public conversations about religion focus primarily on the political and cultural: Right wing Christians are obsessed with regulating sexuality! Lefty Christians care about social justice and environmental stewardship! We almost never talk about the emotional and personal reality of religious devotion as it plays out in a believer's life on a day-to-day basis. Radosh's engagement with the pop culture that forms part of many Christians' day-to-day religious experience (he points out that, for some Christians, pop culture is their primary spiritual experience), and his encounters with Christians from across the theological and political spectra, provide readers with a rare opportunity to look into what personal devotion really means to believers in practice. Rapture Ready ends in a call for both Christians and non-Christians to seek greater engagement with one another--and suggests pop culture as one potential vehicle for advancing such exchange. Radosh himself has already served as an excellent role model for such engagement.

Thus far, I've read the part on "Jesus is my girlfriend" music which is, indeed, very easy to make fun of and Radosh makes fun of it effectively (I skipped to this part recalling a hilarious Glenn Dixon lecture on the pornographic subtext of Christian music that I'd heard about a year ago) and I'm looking forward to the rest. Every now and again, I run into someone who hasn't already read Radosh's PowerPoint Guide to American Literature. If you are one such person, then by all means hurry up and click the link. You'll think "I should probably buy this guy's book." And, indeed, you should.

Share This

Comments (14)

snagged it for herself

Not having read this book, I wonder if Radosh is as effective an observer as Trey Parker and Matt Stone, who did an entire South Park episode on the "Jesus is my girlfriend" phenomenon five years ago. In the episode Cartman's Christian rock record with Faith Plus One goes gold, then myrrh:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Rock_Hard

But it's not worth being so snide. Are you, a la E.J. Dionne, "souled out"?

Matt, you come of kind of pompous in this post.

You know, you can make fun of Christians for putting wealth ahead of compassion and ignoring the message of Christ. But making fun of their culture seems kind of pompous. This is why liberals have such a bad rap in the Christian community.

There is no denying that Christian pop culture is a subculture, yet for some reason in this country we are somehow expected to act like the crazy version of Christian culture is the American mainstream. On the one hand, us secularists are told we are outside the mainstream and anti-American, yet members of this subculture actually strive explicitly to live in America, yet not be of mainstream American culture. It's kind of like how there is a weird media narrative that the average American goes to church three times a week, watches NASCAR, pays NRA dues and listens to Toby Keith, when instead that is just one subculture.

But making fun of their culture seems kind of pompous

Why? Don't some things deserve mockery?

Several years ago, I remember reading an interview from a "stripper for Christ". That really takes the "love and do what you will" to a fairly exotic realm. I'm willing to bet that Lars Von Trier read the same interview before he made the Emily Watson movie "Breaking the Waves". And Lars Von Trier definitely deserves mockery.

I've been to enough mainstream Protestant services recently to recognize that there's an egregious amount of hucksterism going on -- the bad music, the rah-rah tone of the sermons, the massive church campuses filled with empty rooms -- that reminds me of sales pitches for time share condos. When that spirit meets sexual hysteria -- as it must -- it's katy bar the dooor for the birth of monsters.

But making fun of their culture seems kind of pompous.

There's a theological principle at work in criticizing evangelical pop-culture. There's no longer a theological imperative to "glorify God by fully using the talents you have been given" but rather "use any talent you have to evangelize for God." The Christian is no longer told to be the best plumber or best artist or best musician he can, he has to be "the plumber who uses plumbing to evangelize for Christ."

Also, from a secular perspective, it is perfectly valid to criticize the aesthetic shortcomings of a movement, even if it is based in religion.

That episode of South Park was classic.

"I wanna get down on me knees and start pleasin' Jesus
I wanna feel his salvation all over my face."

Re: That really takes the "love and do what you will" to a fairly exotic realm.

"Love and do as you wish" means something different in its original context than many people today seem to think. In context, it appears as part of a justification for religious, social and political coercion. St. Augustine's point (among other things) was that coercion and force can be legitimate if they are intended in a spirit of love, for the moral improvement and well being of the person being coerced.

Dammit. That should say "my knees"

Everyone should also read Dan's blog: http://www.radosh.net.

And all you political junkies should know that, yes, he's Ron Radosh's son.

Haven’t read Radosh yet but would also recommend Hendershot’s Shaking the World for Jesus: Media and Conservative Evangelical Culture (2004), which discusses, inter alia, the reasons for and consequences of the influence of pop-culture trends in evangelical Christian communities. In her view, as I recall, Christian pop-culture products had a largely secularizing impact on their consumers even though they were often tools designed for religious outreach and cohesion. Fascinating.

Also, from a secular perspective, it is perfectly valid to criticize the aesthetic shortcomings of a movement, even if it is based in religion.

You got it. It's a bit insulting to religious art to put it in a 'sacred space' (if you'll pardon the expression) where aesthetics and quality don't matter. Some of our greatest and most enduring music is religion-based.

If Christians don't want their subculture mocked, they need to stop denouncing every other subculture as being "Satanic."

Assholes.


Comments closed March 24, 2008.

Copyright © 2008 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.