« Obama's Pragmatism | Main | The Phone Call »

¡Viva Zapatero!

10 Mar 2008 11:44 am

IMG_0465.JPG

In honor of PSOE's successful re-election campaign, I thought I might revisit my April 2006 revisiting of Spain's nightmare of appeasement:

The pro-war left had a more sophisticated take, with The New York Times's Tom Friedman saying he understood “that many Spanish voters felt lied to by their rightist government over who was responsible for the Madrid bombings, and therefore voted it out of office.” Nonetheless, Friedman said, for the new Zapatero government to follow through on its wildly popular commitment to withdraw from Iraq -- a commitment made long before the bombings -- would be a mistake. Spain “should now follow that up by vowing to keep their troops in Iraq -- to make clear that in cleaning up their own democracy, they do not want to subvert the Iraqis' attempt to build one of their own. Otherwise, the Spanish vote will not be remembered as an act of cleansing, but of appeasement.”

Spain declined to take Friedman's advice, and having returned last weekend from a weeklong visit there I can report that the consequences of choosing appeasement have been dire indeed. Superficially, Spanish democracy is still intact and Zapatero's government in Madrid runs the country. Real power, however, is now in the hands of the radical mullahs whose will the government dares not oppose. The city of Toledo, like most of Spain, fell under the rule of Muslim “Moors” in the eighth century who referred to their Spanish possessions as al-Andalus. Toledo was one of the earliest cities brought back under Christian control (by Alfonso VI of Castille in 1085) during the centuries of warfare known as la reconquista. The modern city features a large traffic circle just outside the medieval town walls known as the glorieta de la reconquista in honor of this distinction. But today in a new ironic twist, it is from that very plaza where the Mullahs issue their fatwas that the craven Spanish government, having chosen the path of appeasement, invariably follows. Toledo's women, who only in the recent past enjoyed basic legal equality with men albeit in the context of a culture that was highly traditionalistic by American standards, now fear to walk the streets unveiled. Spain's historic wine industry groans under the crushing yoke of the Islamists' informal power, the riojas of the past but a fading memory. The Mezquita Cristo de la Luz, for centuries a church, is once again a mosque.

Two years on, the satire still holds up.

Photo by me available under a Creative Commons license

Share This

Comments (32)

"While Spain Slept"!

Another interesting thing about this election was that the PSOE (Zapatero's Socialists) were unable to obtain an absolute majority, and so they will form legislative coalitions with other parties, most likely with the Cataloian CiU center left / Catalonian autonomous nationalist party, which increased to 11 seats, while other farther left parties lost seats. The right wing PP did gain seats, though, so overall there was a gain for the two largest parties and losses for many smaller parties.

Zapatero, the milquetoast mediocrity, is handing over Spain to the apostles of abortion and gay marriage. There is now an effort in Spain to change the name of the patron saint, Santiago Matamoros, because it offends the delicate sensibilities of the Islamists. Was it for this that blood was shed at Poitiers, Acre, Hattin, Jerusalem, Vienna, Granada, and Lepanto?

I congratulate Hector for a lifetime achievement award for sheer raving nuttitude.

The New York Times's

That's satire too, right?

Yes Hector, blood blood blood blood blood. Oh the blood blood blood, everywhere spilt blood blood. Shed us the blood blood blood blood blood blood blood.

Hysterical! Especially the veiled women of Toledo part. If six inch stiletto heels and 6 inch mini skirts count as veils; yeah they're veiled alright.

I'm pretty sure the gag was in associating Thomas Friedman with "the left."

Wow.

El Cid,

I'm hoping that Hector was building on Matt's satire.

Hector is a loon, but he does have one decent point here. There is no Spain without the Reconquista and the triumph of the Castilians. Of course, those of who favor independence for Catalonia and the Basque country (and anyone else who wants it) don't have a problem with this, but your usual spit-flecked Spanish nationalist (which I imagine Hector is) obviously does.

I think it was that Friedman column that really made me realize (a little late, I know) what a fraud Friedman is. His argument, essentially, was that no matter how bad an idea the Iraq war was, we should all stay forever so that our enemies (whoever they might be) wouldn't point at us and laugh. Come to think of it, that's pretty much still the pro-war argument today.

Spain is not quite as nominally Catholic as France, but it sure isn't as practicing a Catholic country as Poland. Check out the birth rate. 20% attend Mass on Sunday. Patron saint names and such are mostly for the tourists. "Inquisition Land" isn't an inconceivable theme park.

CiU not really center left.

Spain is not quite as nominally Catholic as France, but it sure isn't as practicing a Catholic country as Poland. Check out the birth rate. 20% attend Mass on Sunday. Patron saint names and such are mostly for the tourists. "Inquisition Land" isn't an inconceivable theme park.

What I enjoy about Matt's satire is that, with little change, it could have been inserted in one of those ridiculous Mark Steyn/Eurabia books, and nobody would have blinked.

Ciu is center right. the real story is how badly radical nationalists did in vasque and ctlyuna. psoe will be very constrained by ciu as a partner except for devolution issues.

Zap is terrible, but rajoy has zero charisma.....think dukakkis with a beard.

Admittedly Charlie I was using the terms loosely, but in the U.S. context would you see CiU as being center-right?

CiU is, in Spanish standards, center right. It's mostly a Euro style christian democrat party when it comes to social and economic policy, and obviously for the interests of Catalonia when it comes to territorial policy.

In US standards I'd put them with conservative Democrats. Nominally against abortion and pro-God, but respectful of the existing laws and not willing to stir the pot. (it would be a political suicide in Spain to try to ban abortion or, for that matter, gay marriage. Even the PP won't touch those).

I'd also add that while Zapatero often strives to live up to the caricature liberal, he's mostly harmless (the economic crash that's coming would have been coming with another government anyway, since it was being fueled already half a decade ago with the coastal construction craze). And also the Spanish electorate tends to be pretty conservative in the sense of very rarely voting the ruling party out of power in a spectacular way.

"Zapatero, the milquetoast mediocrity, is handing over Spain to the apostles of abortion and gay marriage."

I like the taste of that milquetoast. Really, Hector, know your audience. You're on a liberal guy's blog complaining about gay people? Do you think that's gonna win anyone over?

Mr. Bim,

I'm not spit-flecked, and I'm not Spanish (I'm not even white, for that matter). You are very correct that Spain is defined by the Reconquista and by the Christian faith. I do happen to believe in the Christian faith and in Spanish and Hispanoamerican culture and identity, and I am violently opposed to the idea that they should fall either to Anglo-American liberal capitalism or to Islam.

Mark Steyn is pretty silly, and his obsession with falling birth rates overlooks the fact that much of the world is already overpopulated and that natural resources are very, very finite. But the threat of Muslims taking over Christian nations by stealth is a very real fact. Look at Lebanon, founded as a Christian homeland, and now almost 60% Muslim. Look at Bosnia. Look at four of the five ancient patriarchates of Christendom, which are under Muslim rule. The present of Lebanon is the future of Spain, if she does not get her act together and remember the legacy of the Reconquista.

It was an excellent victory for the Spanish Socialists. Unlike the Dems, they actually came across and implemented what they said they were going to do. And what do you know? It was popular.

Hmmm, might be a lesson in that.

Hector,

I'm not sure we're communicating clearly here. The idea of "Spain" is absolutely founded on the Reconquista and the triumph of the Castilians. If people no longer see this as the sine qua non of Iberian history or their identities, then there isn't a great justification for the maintenance of one Spanish state. You clearly are a Spanish nationalist, whether you are a Spanish citizen or not (lots of Spanish citizens aren't white, and many weren't even before the recent immigration waves). Based on your creepy obsession with demographics and tendentious use of historical comparisons that have little to do with one another, I'd characterize you as spit-flecked as well.

"But the threat of Muslims taking over Christian nations by stealth is a very real fact. Look at Lebanon, founded as a Christian homeland, and now almost 60% Muslim. Look at Bosnia. Look at four of the five ancient patriarchates of Christendom, which are under Muslim rule. The present of Lebanon is the future of Spain, if she does not get her act together and remember the legacy of the Reconquista.

Posted by Hector | March 10, 2008 2:21 PM"

OH TEH MOOSLIMS! People wrote the same thing about Catholics in this country not too long ago. Hell, Samuel Huntington still loves him a large bowl of crazy every now and again when it comes to Catholics. Then again, considering that the largest Catholic part of the world - Latin America - became Catholic due to violent conquest, shrieking that Bosnia became Muslim is just silly. It's not like the Bosnians were behind Milosevic or the Utashe, after all.

Also, the legacy of the Reconquista for a lot of people was persecution, forced conversions and genocide. Yeah, that's really something to be proud of. It's one thing to be proud of your independence, but to be scared shitless because of demographics, which are not destiny, or because some places that 1,000 years ago were Catholic and now aren't is just silly. Back then, the Philippines, Goa, Louisiana and Massachusetts, etc. weren't exactly Catholic either. Also, if you buy into the right-wing fear of the Muslims hordes forcing their social views down our throats, shouldn't you be happy about their views on gay people and abortion?

roger,

Spain doesn't have a divided system with a president and parliament. Once a party wins a majority in the parliament - they are the government. There is no real equivalent to Bush in the Spanish system.

This is a bummer. I was hoping to visit Spain soon. I refuse to put a euro in the pocket of the Islamofascists, however.

Fuck it. I'm going to Branson.

I'd agree that Ciu could be compared to conservative democrats. Maybe even Dixiecrat (joke).

The Muslims taking over issue is actually huge, but it really because of immigration. 5 large groups of immigrants in spain: south americans (ecuadorians), eastern europeans, muslims (morocco), British, and sub-saharan africans.

can't do much about e. europeans and british. It's hard to get riled up about latin americans although i suspect they do bring in a lot of drugs and crime. But it is easy to get riled up about blacks and moors.

So a lot of the anti-muslim sentiment is really immigration sentiment; just the opposite of the US where most of the anti-immigrant sentiment is really just negative feelings about mexicans and their culture.

Hector,

Look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Spain

Muslims are quite a small proportion of immigrants to Spain. Lots of Christian Latin Americans & Europeans, as well as convertible Chinese. No worries.

Re: There is now an effort in Spain to change the name of the patron saint, Santiago Matamoros, because it offends the delicate sensibilities of the Islamists.

I don't know that is the name of the saint that offends, but rather the ludicrous medieval portrayals of the saint beheading Moors. St James lived centuries before Islam and the ancient hagiograhy doesn't mention him committing murders. And is a murderous saint that sort of paragon one would wish to extol in the Christian faith?

Hector,
does the fact that a country was founded as a 'christian homeland' oblige its citizens to be christians forever? What if the citizens want to convert to islam, any other religion or stop believing in a deity; are they allowed to convert or do they still have to be christians? Your reasoning seems to imply they have an obligation to the countries founders.

Well, according to Cheney, if there's a one percent chance Spain will go Muslim, we have to invade them - NOW, before we get a mushroom cloud on US soil.

Somebody ask Don Rumsfeld what it will cost, and Paul Wolfowitz how it will pay for itself in free tortillas.

JonF,

I would hardly call killing Saracenic soldiers in the heat of battle 'murder'. As for military saints, I don't believe Christ was a pacifist. If he was, he would have told the centurion (Luke 7:2-9) to stop being a centurion, but he didn't. St. Joan of Arc was a leader of soldiers as well.

The imagery of St. James killing Moors is obviously metaphoric, it is meant to convey the idea that God works through history, and that His influence helped to preserve Europe from Muslim domination. I believe that, and I don't see why the Spanish think they should be ashamed of believeing that.

Mr. Par (is that Swedish by the way)?

To be exact, it's not that the Lebanese ever ceased being Christian. Lebanon lost its Christian demographic majority as a consequence of
1) Christian emigration to Latin America, North America, and various other parts of the world
2) lower birthrates among the better-educated Christian population (the Christian Arabs of Lebanon currently have a below-replacement birthrate, much like the Christians of South India)
3) massive immigration by Palestinians.
It also didn't help that the Christians of Lebanon are divided among several groups who have traditionally been rivals instead of uniting to protect the national religion.

I'm not _forbidding_ any Lebanese from doing anything they want. If they all want to emigrate to Argentina, more power to them- and given that the Israelis seem to feel free to shell their country every now and then, I don't really blame them. I do feel more than a bit sad that one of the last outposts of Levantine Christendom is fading away, after having held its own for two thousand years. And I don't want other Christian communities whether they be in India, Armenia, Ethiopia, Serbia, Holland, or Spain to suffer the same fate. The fate that befell Antioch and Alexandria in the past is befalling Bethlehem and Beirut today and will befall Granada and Marseilles in the future.


Comments closed March 24, 2008.

Copyright © 2007 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.