« Straight Talk | Main | New Hulk »

Refugees and Militias

15 Apr 2008 01:03 pm

Refugees International has a new report out about Iraq's internally displaced people and the tie-in between this and the militia issue. Ken Bacon, President of RI, noted on a conference call that there's been "much less focus" on the internal dimension of the Iraqi refugee problem, even though it involves a huge number of people -- 2.7 million are internally displaced.

Nir Rosen visited Iraq recently and explained that due to Iraq's lack of state capacity, the primary responsibility for taking care of refugees has fallen on militia leaders who, naturally, use that situation to consolidate their power. He said that Sadrist movements "resettle displaced Shias in the homes of the Sunnis that they displaced" where they are "not charged rent, and often provided with stipends." In turn, he reports that "very often we saw them joining the Mahdi Army, though unlike joining the Awakening groups you don't get a salary." You do, however, get these refugee-related benefits.

Conversely, in Baghdad's Sunni enclaves, Awakening groups are "giving people the homes of displaced Shias, or occasionally of people they say belonged to al-Qaeda." Rosen also described them as "running protection rackets and extorting shopkeepers." Meanwhile, he says that "in every Sunni neighborhood that I visited, displaced Sunnis were joining the Awakening groups" which technically isn't supposed to be allowed (they are, after all, the Concerned Local Citizens) but the Awakening groups want the recruits and they have goodies to hand out so people sign up. According to Rosen, Awakening leaders "very openly say that we have a temporary cease-fire with the Americans because we have a more important enemy -- the Iranian occupation" which is how they see the current ISCI/Dawa government.

Kristele Younes from RI notes that one consequence of the political agendas of both the U.S. and Iraqi governments is that at the moment there's no contingency planning under way to find ways to mitigate humanitarian problems in case large-scale fighting occurs. After all, such contingency planning would involve conceding that things might get worse, and at the moment all the pressure is on talking about how much things are improving and destined to improve. She called for more American humanitarian spending and also for more spending from the Iraq government: "Iraq is sitting on a lot of money and it is only fair that it would spend some of it to respond to the humanitarian crisis."

Share This

Comments (7)

"You do, however, get these refugee-related benefits."

But do they get free universal healthcare? If so, then Petey will champion the Shia cause.

What about paid family leave for sex-change surgery? That will rope in the rest of you.

These Muslim religious nutbags are taking a page from the D playbook-- pretty savvy folks, no?


These Muslim religious nutbags are taking a page from the D playbook-- pretty savvy folks, no?

Probably because they botched the whole "An armed society is a polite society" bit.

I stay armed (and dangerous) just in case the Jehovah's Witnesses come down my driveway ... I don't need no stinkin' watch towers.

you'd need to be suicidal to unilaterally disarm in such a dysfunctional country.

1) RI President Ken Bacon and UNHCR Goodwill Ambassador and actress Angelina Jolie were both speakers at a House International Relations Council/Refugee Caucus event in conjunction with World Refugee Day (2003).
2) Angelina Jolie was in "Sledge: The Untold Story" (2005) with Jim Cody Williams
3) Jim Cody Williams was in "Rails & Ties" (2007) with Kevin Bacon

QED: Kevin Bacon wants America to fail in Iraq.

Why, Kevin? Why????

But if you listen to Fred Barnes and Charles Krauthammer you would hear that the insurgency is over, al-Qaeda has been defeated, the civil war has ended, and political reconciliation is proceeding apace. To read this post one would have to conclude that F.B. and C.K. are simply pieces of worthless garbage that have dangerously and incompetantly misconstrued what is going on in Iraq. And if that was the case surely they would cease to promulgate their opinions for fear of being wrong again and thereby contributing to the causes of terrible human suffering, and certainly Fox News wouldn't have such honorless individuals on almost every day.

All I can say to Nir Rosen's report is: Yup. That sounds about right from everything I've read lately.

Iraq is a powderkeg - and the US is the match.

One other point: since the sectarian cleansing has already produced most of the displacement, any further civil war between the factions will probably make it harder for people to escape it by moving to other areas. They'll simply have to either take part in it - which is probably why everybody is signing up with the militias - or just take it.

Sadrist movements "resettle displaced Shias in the homes of the Sunnis that they displaced" where they are "not charged rent, and often provided with stipends."

Sounds remarkably like Israeli settlements in the West Bank.


Comments closed April 29, 2008.

Copyright © 2007 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.