« California Love | Main | Washington Offseason »

Did McCain Vote for Bush

06 May 2008 01:13 pm

Arianna Huffington says John McCain told her shortly after the 2000 election that he didn't vote for George W. Bush, McCain's camp now denies this which prompted this funny rejoinder from Huffington about McCain's history of denying he did things he clearly did:

He denied ever talking with John Kerry about his leaving the GOP to be Kerry's '04 running mate -- then later admitted he had, insisting: "Everybody knows that I had a conversation." He denied admitting that he didn't know much about economics, even though he'd said exactly that to the Wall Street Journal. And the Boston Globe. And the Baltimore Sun. He denied ever having asked for a budget earmark for Arizona, even though he had. On the record. He denied that he'd ever had a meeting with comely lobbyist Vicki Iseman and her client Lowell Paxon, even though he had. And had admitted it in a legal deposition.

Clearly, I don't know what McCain did or didn't do in the voting booth in 2000, but considering the position she was taking at the time it does seem like the logical thing to do would have been for McCain to support Gore. In 2000, after all, Bush's signature initiative was a tax cut proposal that, at at the time, McCain opposed -- just like Gore. Similarly, McCain's signature initiative was a campaign finance reform proposal that Bush opposed but Gore favored. On foreign policy, I don't think a clear differentiation emerged between Bush and Gore, but many construed Bush's rhetoric as calling for a retrenchment of American commitments abroad at a time when McCain was calling to expand them and adopt "rogue state rollback" as a signature issue. Gore's running mate was Joe Lieberman, who's clearly someone McCain adores. As a career Republicans, you could imagine McCain deciding he couldn't possible vote for Gore and just not voting, but considering the issue positions and personal bitterness why would McCain have voted for Bush?

The issue landscape has changed a lot in eight years with Democrats generally moving left on domestic issues while McCain's moved right and seen the GOP mainstream line up with his previously idiosyncratic brand of apocalyptic nationalism even as the once-pressing McCain-Feingold issue has come to look trivial. But in the past McCain voting for a Democrat was quite plausible -- after all, he soon went on to discuss switching parties, to discussing being Kerry's VP nominee, etc.

Share This

Comments (18)

Clearly, I don't know what McCain did or didn't do in the voting booth in 2000, but considering the position she was taking at the time it does seem like the logical thing to do would have been for McCain to support Gore.

I have to assume that's a typo, and you meant "the positionS HE was taking..."

I don't know why Arianna Huffington wanted to share this little anecdote... doesn't it reinforce the false "maverick" media driven image of McCain and hinder tying him to Bush's policies?

I guess it's good to point out how he changes political positions more than people change their socks, but it seems to work in McCain's favor more than the Dems.

McCain voted for Gore simply because he wanted the 2004 nomination.

Issues have absolutely nothing to do with it.

Doesn't your speculation collapse given that McCain campaigned for Bush in 2000?

http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTY4ZWNjZDExODczZDVkMGQ2MzJmN2YzYmVhMWRlMWQ=

McCain is even more unprinicipled than Hillary. The guy has pretty much no coherent views on anything, except his desire for power.

Of course, Arianna Huffington is something of an expert on political transformations, having gone through about three herself in the last decade. So I believe her.

Interesting. Especially since McCain told Arianna's "Shadow Convention" that he supported Bush.

Oh, and contra Matthew, McCain also told the Shadow Convention that he agreed with Bush on 95% of the issues.

doesn't it reinforce the false "maverick" media driven image of McCain and hinder tying him to Bush's policies

Sure, with spin and a 2nd derivative.

Mainly, it emphasize what a liar he is.

How did anyone vote for Bush? Really, just how does one make that decision? Have you ever met someone that made a personal choice in their life and doing it was so alien, so abstruse as to be incomprehensible to you? Like committing pedophelia? Screwing a goat? Having the word "Loser" tattooed across their forehead? Going bankrupt within a couple years of winning multiple millions in a lottery? Getting drunk and telling a cop "You can suck on this!" when he asks for your ID? Can't even imagine yourself doing any of those things, can you? Must be what frame of mind people were in when voting for Bush. Broke, kiddy-diddling, goat-fucking losers sitting in jail with a dead son in the ground. You know, Republicans.

Doesn't your speculation collapse given that McCain campaigned for Bush in 2000?

http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTY4ZWNjZDExODczZDVkMGQ2MzJmN2YzYmVhMWRlMWQ=

J.W. Hammer:
One man's maverick is another man's flip-flopper. You could also question what kind of core convictions McCain has. Does he have anything he won't flop on for political expediency's sake? Then there is McCain's forward to The Best and the Brightest. I wonder when someone in the TradMed will ask him about that.

Is it any surprise that McCain couldn't vote for Bush after Bush smeared him so in South Carolina? Back then, McCain still had some integrity. It was after the "hug" and the next eight years that he sold his soul to the devil.

McCain is a classic narcissist, he does what's best for John McCain at any given time, without regard to anything else.

So the obvious answer is: John McCain wrote in "John McCain" in 2000.

No. Freaking. Doubt.

John McSame:
Bingo!! I have no doubt that Cindy wrote in his name as well.

Doesn't your speculation collapse given that McCain campaigned for Bush in 2000?

Did you see video of the event highlighted in that blog post. If I didn't know better, I would've guessed there was a gun pointed to McCain off camera. He did that for the party, not the man.

McCain voted for Gore simply because he wanted the 2004 nomination.

Issues have absolutely nothing to do with it.

My money says Hillary voted for Bush in 2004 for similar reason.

I'm not a doctor, but I have been to one before, so I am qualified to diagnose John McCain with "Senioritis". Symptoms include:
1)aggression toward others
2)forgetting stuff that you said/did recently
3)making up stories about stuff you said/did long ago.
Treatment: Relaxing for next 12-16 years in the US Senate, opening a BBQ stand in DC for reporters, hanging out with Fred Thompson, WTF - get off my lawn!

A bunch of nonsense from a smear-artist leftist.

Of course McCain voted for Bush. It's a smear tactic by Arianna Huffington. The only reason why Arianna is famous is because she had to screw people other than her husband.

The fact is that McCain campaigned for Bush and supported Bush and that's that.

Nobody ever asks Barack Obama if he voted for ultraracist Democrat Gus Savage, but the odds are that he did.

Uh, isn't the bigger isue that the pasty-faced old motherfucker is a BALD-FACED *LYING MOTHERFUCKER? He lies like a bad rug. They could catch him on film raping and murdering a 14 year-old Iranian girl in a garish, Arabian knights faux-festive palace boudouir just outside of Qom, time-coded, dated, no question -the real version of events...and, our Great American Hero maverick icon, the noble TR inheritor Bill Maher assures us is "an honorable man" will with placid self-solicitude look at the camera in and declare: "My good friends, believe me, I was never in Iran, in that silly town, anywhere near there. The tape is a fake, and not a very good one at that."

And, Howie Kurtz, Richard Cohen, Mitch Albom, Cokie Roberts, David Brooks, and 402 other baby-boomer liberal/neo-liberals will swoon. While John Warner, Joe Lieberman, Evan Bayh and Mitch McConnell commend him in full view of the Senate and Mr. and Mrs. America - the *bewildered herd sitting with dull rapture at home.

Moral of the story?

John McCain is a congenital, pathological L-I-A-R.

The primary reason he gets along so well with the zio-cons, neo-ctns, leo-cons, is their common love for Straussian dissembling.

*credit to the late, great, Saul Bellow.


Comments closed May 20, 2008.

Copyright © 2007 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.