« Clever Karl | Main | Taking the Train »

MediMcCain

22 May 2008 03:39 pm

Michael Scherer explains how the McCain campaign plans to release medical records in a manner carefully calculated to make it as difficult as possible for accurate information about McCain's medical history to reach the public:

The actual medical records will be viewed by only a select few news organizations, and even fewer print reporters. According to a report in the New York Times, the pool that will view the actual medical records Friday morning will include reporters from the three national wire services, the Associated Press, Reuters and Bloomberg, as well as the major television networks, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN and Fox. Only two newspapers are scheduled to be allowed access, the Washington Post and the Arizona Republic. While prior McCain campaign pool events have included a spot for a newsmagazine reporter, no reporter from TIME, Newsweek or U.S. News will be allowed to view the records, the campaign confirmed Thursday morning. All print reporters traveling with the campaign will receive a pool report of the records review, which will be written by pool reporters.

On top of all that, this is going to be done on the Friday before Memorial Day weekend so that stories will run on one of the lowest-audience news days. A responsible reporter doing a story on McCain's medical records would, of course, want to obtain the actual records and then discuss the documents with, say, independent doctors who might have actual expertise on the matter. Even really great campaign reporters obviously aren't qualified to look briefly at some medical documents and draw any meaningful conclusions from them.

Share This

Comments (22)

I'm pretty sure its considered unethical for outside doctors to look at McCain's medical records and issue opinions on them.

Wasn't McCain much more open with his medical records in 2000?

Perhaps, he has something to hide now....

An aggressive News Media would practice strategic reporting: write a story about how the fleeting glance at medical records indicates that McCain has shown symptoms of Alzheimer's and recurrent cancer. Then, offer to make a correction, when McCain coughs up the records for more thorough examination.

Hopefully, the Washington Post's representative will restrain themselves, and not burst out, "My God - The man has no brain!!

Feel free to crack wise about the hemmorhoids, though.

McCain obviously is hiding something.

Um, why would it be unethical for outside doctors to look at the medical records, if McCain had released them to the reporters (and therefore, to the general public, since the reporters' job is to tell the general public about them). Outside doctors could read about the records in the paper, and that wouldn't be unethical.

"Even really great campaign reporters obviously aren't qualified to look briefly at some medical documents and draw any meaningful conclusions from them. "

What is really needed is a reporter with a photographic memory, or a reporter who has a cellphone with a photographic memory.

Medical records given his age are necessarily going to present difficulty for the media. After all, they're in Greek and report on whether his humors are in balance.

Even a doctor would require some time to review the records. It sounds like the reporters are getting a glimpse, and not actual time to sit, study, cross reference, and ask for expert opinions.

McCain: "Here are my records."

Reporters: "But you held them up 30 yards away from us."

McCain: "I stand by my assertion that I showed you my medical records."

Did the report also mention that the records would only be available for viewing on a roller coaster, at night, while loud music is blared through a portable PA system?

A clever media outlet interested in uncovering something valuable would send its medical reporter to this dog-and-pony show. But since it's probably going to be the same guys and girls who have been covering the campaign, I just hope no one smeers barbeque sauce on the documents.

I believe CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta was going, and he's a neurosurgeon sayeth Gazoogle.

I notice they left the NY Times off the list. I guess McCain was afraid that the Times would send its medical reporter, Lawrence Altman, M.D. to take a look.

As a medical student, a brief glance by campaign reporters (no offense to them, but you have to go to medical school for a reason) would not be enough to determine anything substantive. The total number of pages of Mr. McCain's medical records is probably quite high and I imagine this is akin to a "document dump." Even for a qualified medical person, it would be hard. The stuff already in the public domain about Mr. McCain's potential health is already concerning (Stage 3 melanoma is a classic "never really in remission" type disease), and any new information would probably require several specialists to look at for full evaluation. I don't think this qualifies as transparency.

Also, to the top poster:
It would be unethical to offer medical ADVICE unsolicited and without complete access to the relevant information (e.g. John McCain should take Vytorin, John McCain should have surgery, etc), but I don't think there is anything that says doctors should offer opinions on publicly available information.

Medical records given his age are necessarily going to present difficulty for the media. After all, they're in Greek and report on whether his humors are in balance.

John Haber wins the thread.

Well, you know, when you're that age, you've gotta schedule all your dumps.
.

GMT comes in a respectable second.

Isn't this disclosure mechanism consistent with what John Kerry did in 2004?

If CNN is sending Gupta, I'd be surprised if the rest of the organizations didn't also sub in their medical correspondent. They may or may not be an MD like Gupta but they'll understand what the hell they're reading better than a communications major TV reporter.

As for Dr. Altman, isn't the NY Times a member of the Associate Press? If the AP doesn't have another doctor-reporter handy, it could sub Altman in as the wire reporter.

McCain famously built his beloved status in the press by hanging out on the Straight Talk express with them and Straight Talking non-stop, about anything, no-holds-barred, blah blah blah. You would think that this kind of stinginess with information might take some of the bloom off the rose. So I say, withhold away, Saint McCain!

I saw this over on Markos site. One of the interesting things about medical records are though is that they are not a gaffe, so if there is something serious in the medical records it will not go away over the weekend or be lost in the Friday news dump. I think the sketchier thing here is the coercion in the news media of hiding something about Sen. McCain's health. The thing that might actually be lost in the Friday news dump isn't anything that comes out of McCain's health records, but instead the fact that they are not opening up the information to the voters and the fact that these news institutions might keep something they find secret so as not to disenfranchise themselves for the rest of McCains campaign. That could be a huge issue and I hope it doesn't happen! Hopefully there is enough arm-chair reporters out there to make sure we don't get faked left while McCain goes right.

If CNN is sending Gupta, I'd be surprised if the rest of the organizations didn't also sub in their medical correspondent.

Gupta's the Cablenews Doctor, so whether he's there -- flown out from Atlanta for the day -- is a decent test of whether the cabloids are at least making the appearance of doing their jobs. Being competitive, they'll not want to face a TV doctor deficit.

Of course, if we see a load of designated campaign embeds / BBQ correspondents doing the job, we'll know what the deal is.


Comments closed June 05, 2008.

Copyright © 2008 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.